Monday, April 21, 2014

The Book of Blue by Rebecca Banks

The Book of Blue by Rebecca Banks 
 The Book of Blue is a modern-day love story in poetry, written in a time of great darkness and great light, a story of the heart, the song of love.  The book was inspired by the Muse and the "blue dove" painting by Pablo Picasso, as if the refrain was channeled through the artist and poet.  "Blue you are the dove." weaves through the entire work, encapsulating each verse as if the poem is a chant, a prayer, a love song to Blue.

About the Author

Rebecca Anne Banks (poet, singer, songwriter, musician, writer, artist, philosopher, counselor) is at home in Montreal. She is the CEO/artist at Tea at Tympani Lane Records ( and the poetry editor at Subterranean Blue Poetry (

My Opinion:
The Book of Blue carries itself like a lullaby I could read  out loud to myself on my porch in the evening breeze.  The structure is simple and skeletal reflective of the reference sketch by Picasso.  The ever-present mood is one of hope and wanting.  At times it appears repetitive and serious in the context that the poet's focus is strong and eager. I would have liked to get more inside the author's head and get a better view the surroundings.  I give it 3 1/2 stars.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Come find me

5.6x8.6 B&W posterClicking on this will take you to a webpage for definitions of 40 major world religions.
I am excited to participate in some cool events coming up.  Come to the conference for a free art journaling workshop.  Find my latest publication in Tesseracts 18!

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

I am a writer of colored character.

Christopher Meyers said - "Too often today’s books remain blind to the everyday reality of thousands of children. Children of color remain outside the boundaries of imagination. But what it means is that when kids today face the realities of our world, our global economies, our integrations and overlappings, they all do so without a proper map. They are navigating the streets and avenues of their lives with an inadequate, outdated chart, and we wonder why they feel lost.
When I realized how few characters of color exist in literature for young people I went straight to work and wrote a novel with a brown, male main character. BECAUSE the statistics were grossly unfair and biased. I cannot be a part of the mass of white authors who stay safely behind their Caucasian safety nets  in order to avoid stereotypes or inconsistencies in culture.  It seems many minority characters end up being either an overstated stereotype or a helpless victim easily disposed of.   OR the authors who, in order to avoid offending anyone, leave the minority race characters to be written by minority race authors who, apparently, have free reign to describe their race and culture however they feel because they won't be chastised as harshly.  I won't stifle my stories with extensive research in order to portray my colored characters in exact adherence to ethnic norms because in reality today many of these traditions have been dropped. (especially in Canada where generations have passed since our ancestral immigrations).  I can write what I know because in the end, we are all human and that is something I know a lot about.

I am also a writer of colored characters because that is what kids need.  Kids need to experience and related to their identity in the books they read.  They need to know that their race exists outside of cultural folktales.  They need to feel apart of the society they live in.  They need to feel included and confident to interact with the diversity around them. So, I'll do the best I can even though for some of you it might not be good enough. My character might act "too white" or "too unreal" and I can accept that.  What I won't do is omit the character because I'm not willing to take that chance.  I'm not willing to have my readers think the absence of colored characters is acceptable.

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

A Test for a Test

Andrea Schleicher (2010) said: “Schools have to prepare students for jobs that have not yet been created, technologies that have not yet been invented and problems that we don’t know will arise.”

We should be solving real problems, asking questions that matter instead of remembering and repeating facts. Adults’ accomplishments are linked far more strongly to their creativity than IQ (source) and we should be celebrating diverse knowledge and interest instead of trying to standardise knowledge and skills.
Doing something new and getting poor results on the old test shouldn’t surprise anyone. What is the point of doing something new and different if we get the same results on standardized tests… then we might as well just do factory schooling, conform and comply.
If I had asked the people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses” – Henry Ford
That is exactly what we are doing today. We are asking our students to remember more, write better and repeat faster then before… just like we wanted the faster horse, when really we should be asking for the car. Sure the car wasn’t better than the horse in the beginning and our education system won’t be perfect either. It will never be perfect, it should be constantly evolving and we should strive to make it better every day.
I don’t know what a perfect education system looks like, and don’t think it even exist. But I believe that if we talk, try something different, fail forward, investigate and share what we do, not only locally but globally, we can get a lot closer.

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Digital Hospitality

I've been having a debate with myself over whether or not digital entertainment is conducive to developing relationships.  At first glance it would seem obvious that face to face interactions would be much more beneficial. However, when it comes to siblings I can see my kids watching each other play video games, helping each other out and being relatively agreeable (not to mention quiet). Until computer time is over and they have to experience imagination play.  They are really good at role playing, dramatizations and teamwork.  Unfortunately it only lasts for a few moments before they explode into an intense battle.  Someone wouldn't follow the rules, someone ignored someone else or hit them or past a harsh judgement that resulted in name calling and bullying.  They had time to create a royal empire but their enjoyment is short lived.
So my question is: Is it worth it?  As a parent do I promote free play when it always ends in chaos?  Again, the obvious answer is yes.  They need to develop creativity, social skills and competence in dealing with reality, but the reality is they have violent tendencies and no control over their aggression. Wouldn't it be better to just sit around a screen, quietly and politely helping each other?
Last night is a prime example.  We had friends over and when told to go play they ended up watching each other play video games.  It was great for the moms, we got to talk and relax without any interference.  But, we wanted the kids to interact so we turned off the screens.  Not more than five minutes later the boys were screaming murder, the girls were running crying to their rooms, and I was wiping up a bloody nose.  At times like these I find it hard to convince myself that non-digital play is more healthy.
Some advice please?  And I don't want to hear any arguments in support of video games.